EM Equity three-way: Aberdeen v First State v JP Morgan

There’s been plenty of interest in the JP Morgan EM Opportunities fund. Inevitably, it’s going to draw comparisons with the two bigger GEM funds out there from First State and Aberdeen. So as an academic exercise, I figured it’s worth comparing the performances of all three.

Richard Titherington, the face of JP Morgan EM Opps, is listed as the manager since October 2009. So examining the time period of end-Sep 2009 to end-Feb 2013 gives about 3yrs of data to play with, with a rolling 12-month timeframe. to be fair, 12-month returns come with quite a bit of market noise, but bearing in mind I’m dealing with 3 years of data, it’s probably a sufficient, if flawed (entirely mine), start.

data: Lipper, in USD terms, dividends reinvested

The two charts above say that the fund does well across the ups and downs of the three years that Titherington has been managing the fund. Most of the time, the performance beats the market, and when it does, it’s by a bigger margin than when it doesn’t.

Performance alone says nothing about how he does it, neither does it say whether he’ll repeat this in the future, which are arguably the two more interesting questions. The next question then is how it compares against Aberdeen and First State GEM funds. 

data: Lipper, in USD terms, dividends reinvested

First State GEM leaders is a defensive machine, with a larger margin of outperformance than JPMorgan EM Opps on the downside. It does less well in stronger-than-average bull markets, compared with JPM EM Opps. Still…a clean sheet in down markets is a tough act to follow, unless the fund in question is one Aberdeen GEM fund.

Defensively, Aberdeen rivals First State GEM, with a clean sheet in down markets. On the upside, Aberdeen GEM in the past three years tends to beat the market, but relative to the other two funds, by a smaller margin. Again, clean sheet = tough act.

So from an investor’s point of view, the question of which fund to choose boils down to whether one is looking for a fund that performs well in up markets and down markets, or one that performs well in up markets, but better in down markets. All three are solid performers, with Aberdeen and First State holding

 an edge when markets head south.

Clearly, there’s a lot of interest in the EM story, and a lot of people are filling up the space, which is great for choice. But I reckon there will be more thematic funds coming up. We already have a few EM small cap funds in the space, infrastructure spending is big in India, and China’s consumption story has already inspired a consumption-themed fund or two.

Of course, so much interest in a relatively immature market does raise caution in several better known bears. Andy Xie for instance, has started writing about a BRIC bubble:

‘Whenever there is a hot concept like BRIC, there is a bubble. There has never been an exception.’

While I was away...

So after disappearing for a good month or so, I resurface to find myself completely immersed in the slightly unfamiliar waters of the broader fund universe. To be exact, over 109,000 funds in 57 registered for sale (RFS) countries, according to Lipper.

I find it rather exciting, although not as exciting as a good WWE match. It's quite a learning curve, which is a phrase I wouldn't mind carved on my gravestone, not so much as a lament for the relentless pace of change than a concise summary on a punctuation mark.

But time spent navel gazing, which I'd much rather not do on a public blog, is time better spent ruminating on how to write better articles, or at least more enlightening ones.

There's a small debate growing about long-form journalism, questioning the decline in 2000-word articles in heavyweight publications like the New York Times, Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, and the Wall Street Journal. First up this is obviously a US-centric view of the publishing world, and I don't think you'll find many people worrying over the same question in Singapore. After all there are more important questions to ask, like, 'Dude, where my car?'

Although, if the data from MAS is any indication, there's enough to pay for many cars. Singapore residents as a whole, are pretty damn flush with cash. Approximately S$500billion worth sits in the banks. That's about 10 million cars, worth S$50k each.

data: Monetary Authority of S,ingapore 

URL: https://secure.mas.gov.sg/msb-xml/Report.aspx?tableSetID=I&tableID=I.4